Saturday, January 23, 2016

This just in! FBI to Recommend Prosecution of Hillary Clinton

This just in!

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/01/23/page-and-mclaughlin-the-fbi-will-recommend-prosecution-for-hillary/

So there you have it.  The inner circle thinks that the FBI will recommend prosecution of Hillary Clinton, yet aver that the DoJ will decline to prosecute.  That way, the FBI gets to retain professional credibility, while the DoJ just continues to sail to the edge of the cliff of auto de-legitimization.  Will anyone of note resign in disgust?  I guess we will have to wait and see.



Basic User Info: Protecting Classified Documents |Security Checks ...

If that happens, how will the FBI and DoJ EVER prosecute any case of mishandling classified information?  Will the details of this be "too convoluted and sensitive" to show the Proles just how badly HRC has handled things?  Somewhere I recall that it is a crime itself to classify something that is embarrassing or covers up misdeeds.

There is also this:


18 U.S. Code § 4 - Misprision of felony

"Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."

 

It looks like she can get jammed up for 3 years, per count.  Now, HOW many "mishandled" classified documents were there?  Would she serve concurrently?  Would this be on top of any espionage charges they could lay on her?  I guess she is trying to figure out if orange as a color works for her wardrobe.  In a just world, she'd be in there with Montes, Ames, and Hanssen.  The convicted spies all share similar Communist paymasters, perhaps they'd welcome one of their own. 

 https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/clinton-benghazi_3.jpg?quality=100&strip=all&w=300&strip=all

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

The DOJ does not have to prosecute they can appoint a special prosecutor.

ghost said...

Too bad Sandy Berger has passed or this whole thing would have been socked away long ago.

Partyzantski said...

Anonymous @ 12:24,
You make an excellent point. It would allow DoJ to take the indirect route. I suspect they'd do that to minimize criticism of DoJ while a special prosecutor would then be the guy sent out to catch spears for the amusement of progressive blood sports. They'd use that circus to satisfy the aroused curiosity of the masses of the proletariat, HRC would be politically damaged beyond repair and likely avoid any meaningful prosecution. I suspect that she and her husband (as well as their assorted water carriers) have thick dossiers on everyone who is on the "enemies list" and will be able to convince them to take a pass on this episode on some technicality or other. Recall the "what "is" is" moment.
In the linked Montes document, page 10 covers her motivations. She sounds like any other American Progressive (a.k.a., "Communist"). She sounds like Hillary Clinton. Anti-American to the bone, and committed to the cause of world wide Communism.